Re: [PATCH] "extern inline" to "static inline" allows compile

From: Steffen Persvold (sp@scali.com)
Date: Thu Dec 12 2002 - 18:44:17 EST

Next message: Richard Henderson: "Re: [PATCH] "extern inline" to "static inline" allows compile"
Previous message: Alex Riesen: "oops: 2.5.51 lock_get_status"
In reply to: Richard Henderson: "Re: [PATCH] "extern inline" to "static inline" allows compile"
Next in thread: Richard Henderson: "Re: [PATCH] "extern inline" to "static inline" allows compile"
Reply: Richard Henderson: "Re: [PATCH] "extern inline" to "static inline" allows compile"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Richard Henderson wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 05:09:02PM -0600, Matt Reppert wrote:
> > Comments?
>
> Revert the asm/pci.h change instead.
>

Is there a reason for the 'extern inline', to me it seems more natural to
have 'static inline' ?

Regards,

-- Steffen Persvold | Scali AS mailto:sp@scali.com | http://www.scali.com Tel: (+47) 2262 8950 | Olaf Helsets vei 6 Fax: (+47) 2262 8951 | N0621 Oslo, NORWAY

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Richard Henderson: "Re: [PATCH] "extern inline" to "static inline" allows compile"
Previous message: Alex Riesen: "oops: 2.5.51 lock_get_status"
In reply to: Richard Henderson: "Re: [PATCH] "extern inline" to "static inline" allows compile"
Next in thread: Richard Henderson: "Re: [PATCH] "extern inline" to "static inline" allows compile"
Reply: Richard Henderson: "Re: [PATCH] "extern inline" to "static inline" allows compile"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:26 EST