Re: 2.5.51 nanosleep fails

From: Marco d'Itri (md@Linux.IT)
Date: Thu Dec 12 2002 - 15:57:30 EST

Next message: Thomas Schlichter: "Re: Pinning kernel memory"
Previous message: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
In reply to: Jim Houston: "Re: 2.5.51 nanosleep fails"
Next in thread: Fleischer, Julie N: "RE: 2.5.51 nanosleep fails"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Dec 11, Jim Houston <jim.houston@attbi.com> wrote:

>I was able to reproduce this issue. It happens on all the
>kernels I tried including a stock Redhat kernel. This is just
>an idiosyncrasy of strace. In this case both the strace and
No, it is not. It does not happen with 2.4.x kernel and probably did not
happen with 2.5.50.
It *does* happen with 2.5.51 even when strace is not used:

md@wonderland:~$LANG= tail -f /var/log/uucp/Log
[...]
uucico bofh - (2002-12-12 21:50:27.54 4484) Call complete (4 seconds 2336 bytes 584 bps)

[2]+ Stopped LANG= tail -f /var/log/uucp/Log
md@wonderland:~$ fg
LANG= tail -f /var/log/uucp/Log
tail: cannot read realtime clock: Bad address
[Exit 1]
md@wonderland:~$

-- 
ciao,
Marco
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Thomas Schlichter: "Re: Pinning kernel memory"
Previous message: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
In reply to: Jim Houston: "Re: 2.5.51 nanosleep fails"
Next in thread: Fleischer, Julie N: "RE: 2.5.51 nanosleep fails"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:26 EST