Re: [PATCH] C99 initializers for drivers/scsi (1 of 4)

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org)
Date: Thu Dec 12 2002 - 09:15:49 EST

Next message: Miles Bader: "Re: romfs"
Previous message: Adam H. Pendleton: "RE: Is this going to be true ?"
In reply to: Art Haas: "[PATCH] C99 initializers for drivers/scsi (1 of 4)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 08:04:41AM -0600, Art Haas wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Here's a set of patches for converting drivers/scsi to use C99
> initializers. The patches are against 2.5.51.

That's pointless. If you move them to C99 initializers also get rid of the
silly template defines at the same time. There is no urge for the new
syntax, so do it properly if you touch the code.

And btw, scsi patches go to linux-scsi..

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Miles Bader: "Re: romfs"
Previous message: Adam H. Pendleton: "RE: Is this going to be true ?"
In reply to: Art Haas: "[PATCH] C99 initializers for drivers/scsi (1 of 4)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:25 EST