Re: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?

From: Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Date: Wed Dec 11 2002 - 08:05:04 EST

Next message: DervishD: "Re: [BK-2.4] [PATCH] Small do_mmap_pgoff correction"
Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre1 compile failure: drivers/net/pcmcia/fmvj18x_cs.c"
In reply to: Keith Whitwell: "Re: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?"
Next in thread: Keith Whitwell: "Re: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?"
Reply: Keith Whitwell: "Re: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:45:49PM +0000, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> In any case I don't think the string in the informational is very useful --
> it's a potentially inaccurate translation of state from *another* module, so
> I'm just removing the lot.

Cool, that gets my vote too 8-)

Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: DervishD: "Re: [BK-2.4] [PATCH] Small do_mmap_pgoff correction"
Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre1 compile failure: drivers/net/pcmcia/fmvj18x_cs.c"
In reply to: Keith Whitwell: "Re: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?"
Next in thread: Keith Whitwell: "Re: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?"
Reply: Keith Whitwell: "Re: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.20 AGP for I845 wrong ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:21 EST