Re: Why does C3 CPU downgrade in kernel 2.4.20?

From: Dave Jones (davej@codemonkey.org.uk)
Date: Wed Dec 11 2002 - 05:58:08 EST

Next message: Markus Plail: "Re: CD Writing in 2.5.51"
Previous message: Eyal Lebedinsky: "Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre1 - unresolved symbols: scx200_gpio.o"
In reply to: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: Why does C3 CPU downgrade in kernel 2.4.20?"
Next in thread: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: Why does C3 CPU downgrade in kernel 2.4.20?"
Reply: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: Why does C3 CPU downgrade in kernel 2.4.20?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:19:23AM -0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > Prolly I would have to do more benchmarking to find out about
> > aligment advantages.
> I heard cmovs are microcoded in Centaurs.
> s...l...o...w...

Hardly surprising given that the chip isn't targetted at the performance
market.

Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Markus Plail: "Re: CD Writing in 2.5.51"
Previous message: Eyal Lebedinsky: "Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre1 - unresolved symbols: scx200_gpio.o"
In reply to: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: Why does C3 CPU downgrade in kernel 2.4.20?"
Next in thread: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: Why does C3 CPU downgrade in kernel 2.4.20?"
Reply: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: Why does C3 CPU downgrade in kernel 2.4.20?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:20 EST