On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:02:26 -0500
Stan Bubrouski <stan@ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> I disagree, 2.4.20 is the current stable kernel, it would
> be nice to see how it compares to the current development,
> what's faster, what's not... from Con's previous results
> we can see that some things are indeed not as fast in 2.5.x
> as in 2.4.x. It's just nice to be able to see the whole
> picture. I often follow these threads for just this purpose.
>From this point, if you compare 2.4 vs 2.5 you can just say:
It's faster or slower. Comparing 2.5 vs 2.5 gives you a picture
of what's gone better, and why. IMHO.
Diego Calleja
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:18 EST