Re: [PATCH] Re: #! incompatible -- binfmt_script.c broken?

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@ucw.cz)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 16:49:53 EST


Hi!

> > > > Why can't we simply have /bin/bash_that_splits_args_itself
> > >
> > > We could, but it would in practice mean doing an extra exec() for each
> > > executable. This seems undesirable.
> >
> > Only for executables that need argument spliting... For such scripts I
> > guess we can get handle the overhead.
> >
>
> We probably can, but a better question is really: what are the
> semantics that users expect? Given that Unices are by and large
> inconsistent, we should pick the behaviour that makes sense to the
> most people. I suspect that most people would expect whitespace
> partition.

Most people would also expect " and ' to work, and $FOO to work
:-(. So I believe keeping it simple is right.
                                                                Pavel

-- 
Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net.
What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:18 EST