Re: [TRIVIAL] Re: setrlimit incorrectly allows hard limits to exceed soft limits

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 15:14:44 EST

Next message: kernel@in.gr: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
In reply to: Peter Chubb: "Re: [TRIVIAL] Re: setrlimit incorrectly allows hard limits to exceed soft limits"
Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: [TRIVIAL] Re: setrlimit incorrectly allows hard limits to exceed soft limits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Peter Chubb wrote:

> You always have to set both,

Duh, forgot about that. Nevermind.

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://guru.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: kernel@in.gr: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
In reply to: Peter Chubb: "Re: [TRIVIAL] Re: setrlimit incorrectly allows hard limits to exceed soft limits"
Next in thread: Rusty Russell: "Re: [TRIVIAL] Re: setrlimit incorrectly allows hard limits to exceed soft limits"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:15 EST