On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Peter Chubb wrote:
> Rik> Wouldn't it be better to simply take the soft limit down to
> Rik> min(new_rlim.rlim_cur, new_rlim.rlim_max) ?
>
> Single unix spec says to return EINVAL in this case.
>
> [EINVAL]
> An invalid resource was specified; or in a setrlimit() call, the new
> rlim_cur exceeds the new rlim_max.
So how about "the old rlim_cur exceeds the new rlim_max" ? ;)
Rik
-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:14 EST