Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance

From: Samium Gromoff (deepfire@ibe.miee.ru)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 02:01:29 EST

Next message: george anzinger: "[PATCH 3/3] High-res-timers part 3 (posix to hrposix) take 20.1"
Previous message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: /proc/pci deprecation?"
Maybe in reply to: Mike Hayward: "Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
Next in thread: erich@uruk.org: "Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

As of dualie Xeon vs one-way, the possible reason is the SMP overhead,
because single thread can not benefit from multicpuness...

cheers, Samium Gromoff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: george anzinger: "[PATCH 3/3] High-res-timers part 3 (posix to hrposix) take 20.1"
Previous message: Adam J. Richter: "Re: /proc/pci deprecation?"
Maybe in reply to: Mike Hayward: "Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
Next in thread: erich@uruk.org: "Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Dec 15 2002 - 22:00:14 EST