Re: Reiserfs broken in 2.5.50 (possibly nanosecond stat timefields?)

• Next message: Mika Liljeberg: "[2.5.50] ext3_add_entry: bad entry in directory #288740: rec_len is smaller than minimal"
• Previous message: Jochen Hein: "[2.5.50] more uninitialized timers"
• Maybe in reply to: Colin Slater: "Reiserfs broken in 2.5.50 (possibly nanosecond stat timefields?)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I just tested it and reiserfs works fine here with 2.5.50 with some
> simple stress tests.
>
> Are you sure you loaded the right modules? The new modutils don't
> do any kernel version checking anymore.

Patch from Oleg Drokin fixes this, absolving you from any
responsibility. Sorry to randomly pick a patch and mark it evil. I'm
not sure why I needed this and you (and I assume others) didn't
though. Oleg probably knows.

  Colin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Mika Liljeberg: "[2.5.50] ext3_add_entry: bad entry in directory #288740: rec_len is smaller than minimal"
• Previous message: Jochen Hein: "[2.5.50] more uninitialized timers"
• Maybe in reply to: Colin Slater: "Reiserfs broken in 2.5.50 (possibly nanosecond stat timefields?)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 30 2002 - 22:00:24 EST