Re: [PATCH] Start of compat32.h (again)

From: Andi Kleen (ak@muc.de)
Date: Wed Nov 27 2002 - 03:29:18 EST


On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 09:00:53AM +0100, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:42:28 +1100, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> said:
>
> Stephen> I make the follwing assumptions: returning s32 from a 32
> Stephen> bit compatibility system call is the same as returning long
> Stephen> or int.
>
> That is not a safe assumption. The ia64 ABI requires that a 32-bit
> result is returned in the least-significant 32 bits only---the upper
> 32 bits may contain garbage. It should be safe to declare the syscall
> return type always as "long", no?

But the 32bit user space surely doesn't care about any garbage in
the upper 32bits, no ?

64bit user space might, but that's not driven by a shared compat layer.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 30 2002 - 22:00:16 EST