Re: uml-patch-2.5.49-1

From: Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Tue Nov 26 2002 - 11:45:12 EST


On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Patrick Finnegan wrote:

> That's just one example... the idea is that you want maximal separation
> between the guest OS's apps and the host OS. Sort of like "VM" on IBM's
> series of mainframe architecures. [snip]

That's a nice idea, but in practice you also want efficient
execution of processes in the virtual machines and a virtual
host implementation that's flexible and easy to maintain.

As usual, you can't have everything so you'll have to make
choices here and there. The end result will be a useful
compromise between all the different ideas...

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://guru.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 30 2002 - 22:00:14 EST