Re: [PATCH] unified SysV and POSIX mqueues - complete rewrite

From: Peter Waechtler (pwaechtler@mac.com)
Date: Sun Nov 24 2002 - 20:02:17 EST

Next message: paul_wu@wnexus.com.tw: "Re: Which embedded linux is better for being a router? eCos? uclinux?"
Previous message: John Levon: "Re: Module Refcount & Stuff mini-FAQ"
Next in thread: Michal Wronski: "Re: [PATCH] unified SysV and POSIX mqueues - complete rewrite"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Am Montag, 25. November 2002 00:24 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> Peter Waechtler wrote:
> > ...
> > kernel.patch Type: text/x-diff
>
> It's not legal to call copy_*_user inside spinlock. You
> sem to dothin in several places.

Yes, I know.

here a fixed version - there was also an error in putting the mqflags
together in setattr/getattr

text/x-diff attachment: kernel.patch

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: paul_wu@wnexus.com.tw: "Re: Which embedded linux is better for being a router? eCos? uclinux?"
Previous message: John Levon: "Re: Module Refcount & Stuff mini-FAQ"
Next in thread: Michal Wronski: "Re: [PATCH] unified SysV and POSIX mqueues - complete rewrite"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 30 2002 - 22:00:10 EST