Re: [PATCH] 2/4 Module Parameter Support

• Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: calling schedule() from interupt context"
• Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: Why /dev/sdc1 doesn't show up..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In message <3DD9DBFF.5000009@pobox.com> you write:
> Question for the crowd:
>
> Should linux/module.h include moduleparam.h, since drivers are used to
> include'ing module.h to get all their MODULE_xxx desires fulfilled?

Hmm, they already need linux/init.h for module_init() and
module_exit(). Of course the backwards compat MODULE_PARM must not
require an extra include (and it doesn't, does it?).

I guess this leads to the bigger "what are the rules for new header
files?" question, which I'm not prepared to try to answer.

Rusty.

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Rusty Russell: "Re: calling schedule() from interupt context"
• Previous message: Rusty Russell: "Re: Why /dev/sdc1 doesn't show up..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 30 2002 - 22:00:09 EST