Re: [patch] threading enhancements, tid-2.5.47-C0

From: Ulrich Drepper (drepper@redhat.com)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 17:11:59 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jamie Lokier wrote:

> I don't buy this argument. You block signals, do something, unblock
> signals. There may be a _tiny_ delay in delivering the signal

Tiny? You said yourself that fork can be expensive.

> - of
> the order of a single system call time, i.e. not significant. (That
> delay is much shorter than signal delivery time itself). No signals
> are actually _lost_,

Of course they can get lost. Normal Unix signals are not queued.

- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE93Aiv2ijCOnn/RHQRAippAKCnwjE420nRHMJpGSm86CxNhkgtXwCgjAA3
gqpLLi1ytAanQWzIq+0+sWE=
=TRHu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:34 EST