Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules

From: Cort Dougan (cort@fsmlabs.com)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 14:31:45 EST


} This can be made clean if all the inlined C in the headers are pushed
} back to an actual .c file and the make it function to call as an extern.
} So the solution is to make a patch and publish that patch which cleans the
} out the C code in question and move the associacted GPL license to the new
} .c files. This is proper and legal as structs are just the glue or api.
}
} So if I publish this patch where it can be freely available for usage by
} all, I comply with GPL. This also removes any of the "extremists" points
} of the smallest amount of GPL code invoked by the compiler can not touch
} pure code.
}
} Any arguments why this will not work?

Maybe something else would be better. Adding -fno-inline to the build
might be more useful. It makes things a bit cleaner.

It's a nasty mess to have to do this for every subsystem when someone gets
a wild-hair and starts inline-ing things without thinking.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:33 EST