Re: 2.4.20-rc2 strange L1 cache values

From: Dave Jones (davej@codemonkey.org.uk)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 14:29:15 EST


On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:23:04PM +0100, Steffen Persvold wrote:

> The original poster reported on 2.4.20-rc2 (which reports 0K), not 2.4.18.
> The output I provided was from .18 and that clearly says 'L1 I cache:12K'.
> Here are some 'sniplets' of my 2.4.18 dmesg :
> CPU: L1 I cache: 12K, L1 D cache: 8K

My bad. Yes, earlier kernels did confuse the two.
the 12K actually means the trace cache holds 12,000 uops
rather than you have 12KB of cache.

The only bug is the reporting unit.

> Ok, since this is now fixed (with your patch), I really don't care about
> earlier kernels anyway (however some of my customer might have if it was
> an issue). Do you know if your patch is going into 2.4.20 release (it's a
> rather small and useful patch) ?

I've resubmitted it to Marcelo, but it still didn't show up..

                Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:33 EST