Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules

From: Andre Hedrick (andre@linux-ide.org)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 14:11:43 EST


On 20 Nov 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 18:57, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > The double negative unwrapped:
> >
> > "Being a module doesnt make it not a derivative work."
> >
> > 'Being a module does (not) make it not a derivative work.'
> > 'Being a module does (not) make it (not) a derivative work.'
> >
> > 'Being a module does make it a derivative work.'
> >
> > Is this the intent of the statement?
>
> No

Excellent!

Now if Linus would just make to position clear.

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:33 EST