Re: spinlocks, the GPL, and binary-only modules

From: Nicholas Berry (nikberry@med.umich.edu)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 14:09:41 EST


>>> Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org> 11/20/02 01:57PM >>>
<snip>

> The double negative unwrapped:

> "Being a module doesnt make it not a derivative work."

> 'Being a module does (not) make it not a derivative work.'
> 'Being a module does (not) make it (not) a derivative work.'

> 'Being a module does make it a derivative work.'

> Is this the intent of the statement?

> Andre Hedrick
> LAD Storage Consulting Group

Logical fallacy. You're converting a universal proposition.

Not being on lkml does not make me a fool !=
Being on lkml makes me a fool.

Nik

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:33 EST