Re: [PATCH] remove unused includes and misleading comments from scsi_lib.c

• Next message: Mark Mielke: "Re: [CHECKER] 16 more potential buffer overruns in 2.5.48"
• Previous message: Mike Anderson: "Re: [BUG] 2.5.47: sysfs hierarchy can begin to disintegrate"
• Next in thread: Patrick Mansfield: "Re: [PATCH] remove unused includes and misleading comments from scsi_lib.c"
• Reply: Patrick Mansfield: "Re: [PATCH] remove unused includes and misleading comments from scsi_lib.c"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:47:09AM -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> I had to add back the smp_lock.h include to compile with CONFIG_PREEMPT,
> as kernel_locked was not defined and is used by in_atomic().

Bah. Any chance you could fix the header declaring in_atomic() to pull
in smp_lock.h by itself instead?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Mark Mielke: "Re: [CHECKER] 16 more potential buffer overruns in 2.5.48"
• Previous message: Mike Anderson: "Re: [BUG] 2.5.47: sysfs hierarchy can begin to disintegrate"
• Next in thread: Patrick Mansfield: "Re: [PATCH] remove unused includes and misleading comments from scsi_lib.c"
• Reply: Patrick Mansfield: "Re: [PATCH] remove unused includes and misleading comments from scsi_lib.c"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:32 EST