Re: [CHECKER] 16 more potential buffer overruns in 2.5.48

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@pobox.com)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 12:05:09 EST


Steven French wrote:

> work. It might have be more readable if it were defined as a __u8

tiny pedantic point: s/__u8/u8/ if it is kernel code

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:32 EST