VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz said:
> Rusty told me that it is intentional. Add
> no_module_init;
> at the end of module. He even sent patch which fixes dozen of such
> modules (15 I had on my system...) to Linus, but it get somehow lost.
> Only question is whether we want to have it this way or no.
Some questions you might want to consider before that one:
1. How do we handle "insmod -odummy0 dummy.o ; insmod -odummy1 dummy.o"
2. When does the module name differ from the filename (modulo .o) ?
3. Given your answers to #1 and #2, is the module name redundant anyway?
-- dwmw2- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:29 EST