Re: [patch] threading fix, tid-2.5.47-A3

From: Jamie Lokier (lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Date: Mon Nov 18 2002 - 17:22:02 EST


Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> [...] It the very basic concept of always having a correct
> thread descriptor. A process created with fork() from an MT app is
> different from one created with fork() from a single threaded app. In
> the latter case the thread descriptors are not used and can contain
> garbage. In the former case the descriptor better be correct all the
> time. It basically the same problem as with setting the TLS "register".
> clone() get the CLONE_TLS flag because the child and parent have
> (potentially) different TLS address and it is not possible to set the
> value before the fork() call (since the parent would have the wrong
> value for some time) nor after the fork() (since then there would be a
> window for a signal to arrive for an uninitialized thread).

Ok, I understand now.

    1. You need the child to have a valid thread descriptor immediately after
       fork(), and the parent's thread descriptor to be the same
       before and after fork().

    2. At all times, get_current_thread()->tid must return the current
       thread's tid in both the parent and child.

That is fine. Just allocate a new TLS for the child, use
CLONE_SETTID|CLONE_CLEARTID|CLONE_SETTLS in your threaded fork(), and
pass the child's tid address (in the child's tls area).

It does require allocating a new TLS area on fork(). Is that a
problem?

cheers,
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:25 EST