Re: 2.5.48 Compilation Failure skbuff.c

From: bert hubert (ahu@ds9a.nl)
Date: Mon Nov 18 2002 - 07:54:50 EST

Next message: Andrey Panin: "[Q] is framebuffer console code in 2.5.4x functional ?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] threading fix, tid-2.5.47-A3"
In reply to: Rene Blokland: "2.5.48 Compilation Failure skbuff.c"
Next in thread: James Morris: "[PATCH] Re: 2.5.48 Compilation Failure skbuff.c"
Reply: James Morris: "[PATCH] Re: 2.5.48 Compilation Failure skbuff.c"
Reply: Thomas Molina: "Re: 2.5.48 Compilation Failure skbuff.c"
Reply: Rene Blokland: "Re: 2.5.48 Compilation Failure skbuff.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 01:36:48PM +0100, Rene Blokland wrote:
> Hello, 2.5.48 Doesn't compile for me on a AMD k6-3 with gcc-3.2 and glibc-2.3.1

I bet this just made ipsec mandatory :-) I suggest compiling it in to fix
this problem.

-- 
http://www.PowerDNS.com          Versatile DNS Software & Services
http://lartc.org           Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrey Panin: "[Q] is framebuffer console code in 2.5.4x functional ?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [patch] threading fix, tid-2.5.47-A3"
In reply to: Rene Blokland: "2.5.48 Compilation Failure skbuff.c"
Next in thread: James Morris: "[PATCH] Re: 2.5.48 Compilation Failure skbuff.c"
Reply: James Morris: "[PATCH] Re: 2.5.48 Compilation Failure skbuff.c"
Reply: Thomas Molina: "Re: 2.5.48 Compilation Failure skbuff.c"
Reply: Rene Blokland: "Re: 2.5.48 Compilation Failure skbuff.c"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 23 2002 - 22:00:22 EST