RE: NMI handling rework

From: Heater, Daniel (IndSys, GEFanuc, VMIC) (
Date: Mon Nov 11 2002 - 10:26:29 EST

>> Am I reading this correctly? As long as no one passes back
>> all handlers are run.

> For sanity's sake stick to running through all of them, there should be no

> partial handling, every registered handler should get serviced once per
> NMI interrupt.

I agree. Unless there is some good justification for it, I think the
NOTIFY_STOP_MASK stuff should go away.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:22 EST