Re: [PATCH 2.5.43-mm2] New shared page table patch

From: Benjamin LaHaise (bcrl@redhat.com)
Date: Tue Oct 22 2002 - 14:29:43 EST

Next message: Gerrit Huizenga: "Re: [PATCH 2.5.43-mm2] New shared page table patch"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5)"
In reply to: Gerrit Huizenga: "Re: [PATCH 2.5.43-mm2] New shared page table patch"
Next in thread: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [PATCH 2.5.43-mm2] New shared page table patch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 12:27:57PM -0700, Gerrit Huizenga wrote:
> That would be fine with me - we are only planning on people using
> flags to shm*() or mmap(), not on the syscalls. I thought Oracle
> was the one heavily dependent on the icky syscalls.

You mean the wonderfully untested calls that never worked? At least
they'd tested and used Ingo's 2.4 based patches that made shmfs use
4MB pages.

-ben

-- 
"Do you seek knowledge in time travel?"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Gerrit Huizenga: "Re: [PATCH 2.5.43-mm2] New shared page table patch"
Previous message: Benjamin LaHaise: "Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5)"
In reply to: Gerrit Huizenga: "Re: [PATCH 2.5.43-mm2] New shared page table patch"
Next in thread: Arjan van de Ven: "Re: [PATCH 2.5.43-mm2] New shared page table patch"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Oct 23 2002 - 22:01:00 EST