[RFC] Rename _bh to _softirq

From: Maksim (Max) Krasnyanskiy (maxk@qualcomm.com)
Date: Mon Oct 14 2002 - 14:02:15 EST

Hi Folks,

Old BHs have been almost completely replaced with tasklets and softirqs.
Should we then rename _bh to _softirq ?
i.e
         local_bh_disable() -> local_softirq_disable()
         spin_lock_bh() -> spin_lock_softirq()
         bh_lock_sock() -> softirq_sock_lock()
         etc

Or maybe just 'si' if softirq is too long.

bh prefix and postfix seem to be confusing now.

Max

http://bluez.sf.net
http://vtun.sf.net

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:51 EST