On 10/13, Alexander Viro said something like:
> Mostly those who won't have to clean up the mess afterwards.
> For the record, my vote is "not ready".
Oh shit! This is the "Al Viro stink test" Linus spoke of.
Now, if no LVM type ifrastructure is included in 2.6, all (all who use an
LVM of some type) will all have to
1. update to the latest mainline
2. download the latest dm or evms patch
3. fix all the patch rejects themselves (big problem to overcome when
trying to get people to test with the latest kernel)
I'm NOT saying this is some kind of argument toward inclusion. I guess
I'm just lamenting. I really hoped I'd have one less 3rd party patch to
maintain in my own personal tree.
-- Shawn Leas core@enodev.comI was in the first submarine. Instead of a periscope, they had a kaleidoscope. "We're surrounded." -- Stephen Wright - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:50 EST