On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 04:41:37AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> Also the idea Alexey and I have to move towards a small
> efficient flow cache shared by IPv4/IPv6 plays into this
> as well. There are changesets on their way to Linus tonight
Some people on #lartc were wondering about the use of a route cache if there
is only one route. It was reported that a single default route on a system
that talks to many destinations would lead to a huge route cache, which is
probably not more efficient than looking up the simple route.
Would this 'small efficient flow cache' also solve this problem?
Or is this problem a figment of people's imaginations?
> The initial ipsec is intended to be simple, singly linked
> lists for the spd/sad databases etc. Making the feature
> freeze is pretty important right now, full blown flow cache
> is just performance improvement :)
I know a lot of people are hoping that you make the feature freeze. As said
before, if there is any help you need, just yell.
Regards,
bert
-- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services http://www.tk the dot in .tk http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:43 EST