Jeff Dike wrote:
>
> dank@kegel.com said:
> > George's approach would work a lot better when doing lots of UML VM's
> > on a single box, too, wouldn't it?
>
> My thinking on this is that I'll have UML do the on-demand ticks. ...
> any generic support for on-demand
> ticks would be re-used by UML. And if UML required generic changes for this,
> then that would obviously affect the other ports somehow.
Yes, exactly. UML wants on-demand ticks, which is exactly what George's
patch
uses, too. I'm too far from the code to say, but there ought to be some
commonality there.
- Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:35 EST