On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 05:51:16PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 19:36:12 -0400
>
> As it stands, the syslogging from the printk does more damage to
> performance than the underlying problem. Besides, LVM snapshots
> are slow, but they're useful for a class of problems anyways.
>
> He's just saying kill the real problem first, that's all.
I'm just saying that the message is the only real problem I have with
the state of 2.4. Sure, 2.5 deserves it fixed correctly, but I doubt
the correct fix will make it into 2.4 anytime soon (it's far more
dangerous than we should consider shipping in a "stable" series).
-ben
-- "Do you seek knowledge in time travel?" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:29 EST