Re: [patch] silence an unnescessary raid5 debugging message

From: Benjamin LaHaise (
Date: Tue Oct 08 2002 - 20:02:49 EST

On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 05:51:16PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Benjamin LaHaise <>
> Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 19:36:12 -0400
> As it stands, the syslogging from the printk does more damage to
> performance than the underlying problem. Besides, LVM snapshots
> are slow, but they're useful for a class of problems anyways.
> He's just saying kill the real problem first, that's all.

I'm just saying that the message is the only real problem I have with
the state of 2.4. Sure, 2.5 deserves it fixed correctly, but I doubt
the correct fix will make it into 2.4 anytime soon (it's far more
dangerous than we should consider shipping in a "stable" series).


"Do you seek knowledge in time travel?"
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:29 EST