From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 23:24:44 +0100
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:15:20PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> How about
> bk-commits-head
> bk-commits-2.4
>
> then later bk-commits-2.6 etc...
How about 'stable' and 'devel', then we won't have to worry
about renaming/resubscribing when we switch revisions.
I expect people to maintain 2.4.x even when 2.6.x is
"stable" even once 2.7.x has begun.
Therefore, I like your first idea the best.
Ok?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:28 EST