On Oct 08, 2002 21:47 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:41:43PM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 08:20:38PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:14:00PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > > > Users might just fill up all xattr space leaving no space for ACLs (or
> > > > similar). If user xattrs are disabled this can no longer occur, so some
> > > > administrators might be happy to have a choice.
> > >
> > > Umm, that's why we have quota..
> > It's the per-inode extended attribute space that's at risk here,
> > quotas don't help.
> Well, that's a more important problem. But I doubt a hack to just turn off
> user xattrs is the right fix then. A static reservation for ACLs or just
> totally separating them (like in XFS) seems more m?ture.
Yes, we have made proposals in the past to change the way ext2/3 EAs are
stored on disk, but nobody has had time to work on it yet. The current
limitations of 4kB of EA per inode (user+system) is bad, as is the fact
that you need a full block for each inode if you have any unique
per-inode data (basically anything other than ACLs).
That said, the benefits of the current EA implementation far outweigh the
limitations, and since this is an internal-to-ext2/3 issue, we can
change it at some later date without affecting the rest of the kernel.
-- Andreas Dilger http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:28 EST