Re: [patch] 2.4.20-pre9 - drivers/atm/iphase.c : GFP_KERNEL with spinlock held

From: Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de)
Date: Tue Oct 08 2002 - 03:46:01 EST

Next message: Padraig Brady: "Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))"
Previous message: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "experiences with 2.5.40 on a busy usenet news server"
Next in thread: Francois Romieu: "Re: [patch] 2.4.20-pre9 - drivers/atm/iphase.c : GFP_KERNEL with spinlock held"
Reply: Francois Romieu: "Re: [patch] 2.4.20-pre9 - drivers/atm/iphase.c : GFP_KERNEL with spinlock held"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Francois Romieu wrote:

> Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br> :
> [...]
> > It seems correct. Have you tried to send this to Peter Wang
> > <pwang@iphase.com> ?
>
> Not this one. Last try was something like:
>...

Mitchell Blank Jr <mitch@sfgoth.com> is the current ATM maintainer, could
you try to contact him?

cu
Adrian

You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of time explaining its a free country because its a police state. Alan Cox

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Padraig Brady: "Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA))"
Previous message: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "experiences with 2.5.40 on a busy usenet news server"
Next in thread: Francois Romieu: "Re: [patch] 2.4.20-pre9 - drivers/atm/iphase.c : GFP_KERNEL with spinlock held"
Reply: Francois Romieu: "Re: [patch] 2.4.20-pre9 - drivers/atm/iphase.c : GFP_KERNEL with spinlock held"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 15 2002 - 22:00:23 EST