Re: BK is *evil* corporate software

• Next message: Marcel Holtmann: "Re: [PATCH] Make it possible to compile in the Bluetooth subsystem"
• Previous message: Rik van Riel: "RE:Re: New BK License Problem?"
• In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: BK is *evil* corporate software"
• Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, David S. Miller wrote:

> (as it stands you want $5000 for any bk-using developer inside
> RedHat and SuSE).
>
> Stop spreading crap and fud. I, and nobody else at Red Hat, give or
> need to give Larry one dime to use BK for kernel work.

Actually RedHat does support subversion development, so RedHat must have
some special agreement with BM, so you can legally use BK for free.

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Marcel Holtmann: "Re: [PATCH] Make it possible to compile in the Bluetooth subsystem"
• Previous message: Rik van Riel: "RE:Re: New BK License Problem?"
• In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: BK is *evil* corporate software"
• Next in thread: Rik van Riel: "Re: BK is *evil* corporate software [was Re: New BK License Problem?]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:01:01 EST