On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 13:10, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> Hi Russell!
>
> > And as final proof, the solution taken by two embedded companies is
> > to develop two completely separate cs89x0 driver from the existing one
> > (and then pick one/merge them) rather than fixing stuff in the way
> > suggested by Alan.
>
> Hey, the original cs89x0 driver were just too ugly to actually work on -
> It was much more productive to just start from scratch (;
But in that case if you have a better cs89x0 driver that works well and
works on multiple platforms, 2.5 is the right time to throw it at the
tree and bury the current one
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:58 EST