Re: [PATCH] Use __attribute__((malloc)) for gcc 3.2

• Next message: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net: "RE:Re: The end of embedded Linux?"
• Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "[patch] simplify the Config.in for CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_PCMCIA"
• In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Use __attribute__((malloc)) for gcc 3.2"
• Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Use __attribute__((malloc)) for gcc 3.2"
• Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Use __attribute__((malloc)) for gcc 3.2"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 12:56:22PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I retested it on gcc 3.2 and it unfortunately doesn't make any difference
> (resulting kernel is byte-for-byte identical). So it looks like with
> current gcc it isn't worth the effort.

*shrug* It's still good documentation of intent. And one of
these days we might get around to writing some aliasing code
that doesn't suck quite so much. ;-)

r~
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net: "RE:Re: The end of embedded Linux?"
• Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "[patch] simplify the Config.in for CONFIG_PARPORT_PC_PCMCIA"
• In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Use __attribute__((malloc)) for gcc 3.2"
• Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Use __attribute__((malloc)) for gcc 3.2"
• Reply: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] Use __attribute__((malloc)) for gcc 3.2"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:58 EST