Bob McElrath [bob+linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org] wrote:
> If you give the [nvisr/0] process a negative priority, the stalls go
> away. I just played through a level of Chromium BSU and it performed
> flawlessly (with the nvisr process at -20 priority). With the latest bk
> tree there are also no oopses.
So it seems the way to do this is:
my_workqueue = create_workqueue("mywork");
if (!my_workqueue) {
printk("Unable to create workqueue\n");
return -EIO;
}
pri.sched_priority = 1; /* BM: any nonzero should do, is there any reason
to chose a larger priority? */
rc = security_ops->task_setscheduler(isr_workqueue->cpu_wq[0]->pid, SCHED_FIFO, &pri);
if(rc < 0) {
printk("Unable to set real-time priority for NV (err=%d)\n", rc);
}
The above code doesn't work though because the struct workqueue_struct is
hidden away in workqueue.c, invisible to modules. The line:
isr_workqueue->cpu_wq[0]->pid
bombs because the struct is not defined (dereferencing pointer to incomplete
type). Is there a better way to get the pid of a workqueue I just created? Or
for that matter is there a better way to set the scheduler for a workqueue I
just created? I imagine many drivers would want to do this...
I notice the sched_setscheduler system call is not available in any kernel
header. What is the proper procedure for calling such a function from a
module?
Cheers,
-- Bob
Bob McElrath
Univ. of Wisconsin at Madison, Department of Physics
"The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from
these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe in
blood for centuries." -- James Madison
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:57 EST