Re: Why does x86_64 support a SuSE-specific ioctl?

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Sat Oct 05 2002 - 08:21:55 EST


On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 06:10, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > * viro might have a cow at the use of kdev_t_to_nr... is that required
> > for compatibility with some existing apps? It seems like you want to
> > _decompose_ a number into major/minor, to be an interface that
> > withstands the test of time
>
> It withstands the test of time as well as stat(2) or the loop ioctls.

Is that old stat, stat, stat64 or the proposed new stat64 ?

I see no good reason for this ioctl at all, in any tree.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:49 EST