Re: 2.5.40 compile fails: undef ref in drivers/builtin.o

• Next message: Hans Reiser: "Re: New BK License Problem?"
• Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: 2.4.19 - not a real problem"
• In reply to: sean darcy: "Re: 2.5.40 compile fails: undef ref in drivers/builtin.o"
• Next in thread: sean darcy: "Re: 2.5.40 compile fails: undef ref in drivers/builtin.o"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, sean darcy wrote:

> .config is attached. I'm running rh8.0, gcc 3.2 , binutils-2.13.90.0.2-2

Thanks, this is the well-known problem when you try to compile
drivers/net/tulip/de2104x.c statically into the kernel. A workaround is to
compile de2104x modular.

> thanks
> jay

cu
Adrian

-- 
You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of
time explaining its a free country because its a police state.
								Alan Cox
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Hans Reiser: "Re: New BK License Problem?"
• Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: 2.4.19 - not a real problem"
• In reply to: sean darcy: "Re: 2.5.40 compile fails: undef ref in drivers/builtin.o"
• Next in thread: sean darcy: "Re: 2.5.40 compile fails: undef ref in drivers/builtin.o"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:49 EST