[ANNOUNCE] contest 0.50 benchmark and updated results

From: Con Kolivas (conman@kolivas.net)
Date: Sat Oct 05 2002 - 00:53:43 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I've updated the contest benchmark to v0.50

http://contest.kolivas.net

A significant limitation of the benchmark prior to v0.50 was not knowing how
much work was being done by the background load. Knowing this information
would be helpful in interpreting the data presented by contest. I have added
two more results to each run by contest - an internal number generated by the
load condition describing how much work was done, and the cpu% of the load
while running. Here is a sample of how the information is presented:

noload:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [3] 67.7 98 0 0 1.01

process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [3] 106.5 59 112 43 1.59

io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [3] 492.6 14 38 10 7.33

mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.4.19 [3] 100.0 72 33 3 1.49

The "loads" variable presented is an internal number (the absolute value is
not important) and makes comparisons easier. The LCPU% is the cpu% the load
used while running. Note if you look for example at process_load the CPU% +
LCPU% can be >100 because the load runs for longer than the kernel compile.
However, this has been accounted for in the "loads" result, to take into
account the variable extra duration the load runs relative to the kernel
compile.

An updated complete set of benchmarks will be posted in a separate thread for
clarity.

Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9nn5wF6dfvkL3i1gRAm7BAJkB7jh8eg71+DI307SMW74Aj+oSIACeKQ4h
i9Jx5CsdaKUspW5BB1/DSPU=
=gyF4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:49 EST