Re: O(1) Scheduler from Ingo vs. O(1) Scheduler from Robert

From: Robert Love (rml@tech9.net)
Date: Fri Oct 04 2002 - 14:28:37 EST


On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 11:28, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> On 4 Oct 2002, Robert Love wrote:
>
> > There should _not_ be other things in the patch aside from the
> > scheduler. [...]
>
> hm, i remember there was some 'set max RT priority in .config' stuff
> in it, isnt that the case anymore?

Oh, yes, indeed. I forgot about that.

Since we cleaned up the whole MAX_PRIO thing the only main difference in
my tree is that fact it is exported as a CONFIG setting (and the logic
to implement a new ffs if BITMAP_SIZE changes).

Otherwise the trees aim to be in-sync.

        Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:47 EST