Christoph Hellwig writes:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:27:07AM -0600, Richard Gooch wrote:
> > Those names *were* in mainline. They've been there all through 2.4.x.
> > It's a useful feature that is *still* being used. Change this and lots
> > of people will get a panic at boot because there root FS is "missing".
>
> They have never been the devfs names in_any_ kernel. Linus made you
> change to saner names before merging devfs (saner code would also
> have been a good idea, btw..). Anyway, 2.5 is going to initramfs,
> so feel free to put devfsd into your initramfs.
The convenience names for the root FS *have* been in the kernel since
before 2.4.x. I agree with the initramfs approach: that's been my plan
for handling the rootFS compatibility names (put a mini devfsd into
initramfs). But until all the infrastructure for that is ready, you
can't just go around breaking features people rely on. Especially
where there is no benefit to breaking it.
If you really feel strongly about it, and don't want to wait for
devfsd to be added to initramfs, by all means move the current code
(or the moral equivalent) to initramfs. But you'll have to wait for
initramfs to be available and for it to be the default.
Regards,
Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:45 EST