Pete,
On Fri, 04 Oct 2002, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>
> Also, if you are a provider of a binary-only crapware which wants
> to override syscalls, there's one very important document for
> you to see: it's called Fig.1.
>
> GPLed code has no problem linking with sys_call_table.
>
The code in question (LiS) is LGPL and open source. The iBCS
packge is GPL and open source.
You do know that there *is* open source code which is not
contained in the Linux kernel ;)
So, in this case, GPL and LGPL modules do have a problem linking
with the sys_call_table (on RH 8.0 and I suppose some
development kernels only), because the symbol is no longer
exported and no registration procedure was provided for
registering otherwise non-implemented system calls (in
particular the UNIX98 and iBCS/ABI standard putmsg/getmsg
calls).
And what about AFS? I see that it uses a sys_ni_syscall slot as
well...
In fact all these components are opensource.
--brian
--
Brian F. G. Bidulock ¦ The reasonable man adapts himself to the ¦
bidulock@openss7.org ¦ world; the unreasonable one persists in ¦
http://www.openss7.org/ ¦ trying to adapt the world to himself. ¦
¦ Therefore all progress depends on the ¦
¦ unreasonable man. -- George Bernard Shaw ¦
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:43 EST