On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 07:30:52PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> * FL_FLOCK locks never deadlock, an existing lock is always removed before
> * upgrading from shared to exclusive (or vice versa). When this happens
> * any processes blocked by the current lock are woken up and allowed to
> * run before the new lock is applied.
> * Andy Walker (andy@lysaker.kvaerner.no), June 09, 1995
>
> > If there really is a solid need to hand the CPU over to some now-runnable
> > higher-priority process then a cond_resched() will suffice.
How will cond_resched() work ? Surely that will only give a chance if
the current process has reached the end of its timeslice (need_resched)
? Isn't "schedule()" the right thing here ?
> check needs_resched at syscall exit, so we don't need to do it for
> unlocks, right?
right ...
regards
john
-- "Me and my friends are so smart, we invented this new kind of art: Post-modernist throwing darts" - the Moldy Peaches - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:35 EST