On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 10:54, Erich Focht wrote:
> With simple benchmarks you will most probably beat the plain O(1)
> scheduler on NUMA if you implement (a) in just 1. and 2. as your node
> is already somewhat "sticky". In complicated benchmarks (like a kernel
> compile ;-) it could already be too difficult to understand when the
> load balancer did what and why...
>
> It would be nice to see some numbers.
Here are kernbench results with profiles and a brief analysis provided
by Martin Bligh:
2.5.38-mm1 + per-cpu hot pages
Elapsed: 19.798s User: 191.61s System: 43.322s CPU: 1186.4%
2.5.38-mm1 + per-cpu hot pages + sched
Elapsed: 19.528s User: 189.088s System: 40.488s CPU: 1175.6%
Much improved - user, system, and elapsed are all down.
Some diffs, only things over 50 change printed.
diffprofile nosched sched2
827 default_idle
294 .text.lock.file_table
138 get_empty_filp
124 __fput
97 do_softirq
80 schedule
70 strnlen_user
60 atomic_dec_and_lock
51 path_lookup
-54 __generic_copy_to_user
-55 find_get_page
-61 release_pages
-62 d_lookup
-66 do_wp_page
-75 __set_page_dirty_buffers
-86 file_read_actor
-88 pte_alloc_one
-94 free_percpu_page
-124 clear_page_tables
-160 vm_enough_memory
-224 page_remove_rmap
-253 zap_pte_range
-292 alloc_percpu_page
-940 do_anonymous_page
-967 __generic_copy_from_user
-1900 total
As you can see, all the VM operations take a diet, very cool.
(do_anonymous_page does all the page zeroing for new pages).
Head of new profile now looks like this:
83010 default_idle
5194 do_anonymous_page
4207 page_remove_rmap
2306 page_add_rmap
2226 d_lookup
1761 vm_enough_memory
1675 .text.lock.file_table
1480 file_read_actor
1254 get_empty_filp
1113 find_get_page
937 do_no_page
916 __generic_copy_from_user
875 atomic_dec_and_lock
764 do_page_fault
744 zap_pte_range
668 alloc_percpu_page
662 follow_mount
622 __fput
581 do_softirq
554 path_lookup
520 schedule
M.
>
> Best regards,
> Erich
>
--Michael Hohnbaum 503-578-5486 hohnbaum@us.ibm.com T/L 775-5486
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:35 EST