Re: Dereferencing semaphores and atomic_t's

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Wed Oct 02 2002 - 08:21:08 EST

Next message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: flock(fd, LOCK_UN) taking 500ms+ ?"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [RFC] Simple NUMA scheduler patch"
In reply to: Russell King: "Dereferencing semaphores and atomic_t's"
Next in thread: Mike Anderson: "Re: Dereferencing semaphores and atomic_t's"
Reply: Mike Anderson: "Re: Dereferencing semaphores and atomic_t's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 11:16, Russell King wrote:
> drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c:
>
> SCSI_LOG_ERROR_RECOVERY(3, printk("Wake up parent %d\n",
> shost->eh_notify->count.counter));
>

This is already fixed in 2.4 - just forward port the fixes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Matthew Wilcox: "Re: flock(fd, LOCK_UN) taking 500ms+ ?"
Previous message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [RFC] Simple NUMA scheduler patch"
In reply to: Russell King: "Dereferencing semaphores and atomic_t's"
Next in thread: Mike Anderson: "Re: Dereferencing semaphores and atomic_t's"
Reply: Mike Anderson: "Re: Dereferencing semaphores and atomic_t's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:34 EST