Re: cpufreq patches for 2.5.39 follow

From: Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz)
Date: Tue Oct 01 2002 - 17:59:01 EST

Next message: Robert Love: "[PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Previous message: David McIlwraith: "[2.5.40] DAC960 broken?"
In reply to: Grover, Andrew: "RE: cpufreq patches for 2.5.39 follow"
Next in thread: Grover, Andrew: "RE: cpufreq patches for 2.5.39 follow"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi!

> > > Support for mobile AMD K7 processors is still in development.
> >
> > What about mobile celerons?
>
> Mobile Celerons do not support voltage scaling.

But they can do frequency changes, right? And frequency is what
cpufreq is about, AFAICS. [I do not think k6 supports voltage scaling,
either. And ARM machines can't do voltage scaling, too.]
Pavel

-- 
Casualities in World Trade Center: ~3k dead inside the building,
cryptography in U.S.A. and free speech in Czech Republic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Robert Love: "[PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4"
Previous message: David McIlwraith: "[2.5.40] DAC960 broken?"
In reply to: Grover, Andrew: "RE: cpufreq patches for 2.5.39 follow"
Next in thread: Grover, Andrew: "RE: cpufreq patches for 2.5.39 follow"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:29 EST