Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.39-mm1

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Tue Oct 01 2002 - 05:15:20 EST

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.39-mm1"
Previous message: Petr Vandrovec: "V4L2? (was Re: Linux v2.5.40 - and a feature freeze reminder)"
Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.39-mm1"
Maybe reply: Jens Axboe: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.39-mm1"
Maybe reply: Con Kolivas: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.39-mm1"
Maybe reply: Con Kolivas: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.39-mm1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Sep 30 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > io_load:
> > Kernel Time CPU Ratio
> > 2.4.19 216.05 33% 3.19
> > 2.5.38 887.76 8% 13.11
> > 2.5.38-mm3 105.17 70% 1.55
> > 2.5.39 229.4 34% 3.4
> > 2.5.39-mm1 239.5 33% 3.4
>
> I think I'll set fifo_batch to 16 again...

As not to compare oranges and apples, I'd very much like to see a
2.5.39-mm1 vs 2.5.39-mm1 with fifo_batch=16. Con, would you do that?
Thanks!

-- Jens Axboe

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jens Axboe: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.39-mm1"
Previous message: Petr Vandrovec: "V4L2? (was Re: Linux v2.5.40 - and a feature freeze reminder)"
Next in thread: Jens Axboe: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.39-mm1"
Maybe reply: Jens Axboe: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.39-mm1"
Maybe reply: Con Kolivas: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.39-mm1"
Maybe reply: Con Kolivas: "Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.39-mm1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 07 2002 - 22:00:25 EST